Volume 1 Chapter 18
- Written by LC Geerts
- Published in Compendium of World History
- Read 2757 times
- font size decrease font size increase font size
- Be the first to comment!
COMPENDIUM OF WORLD HISTORY
VOLUME 1
A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Ambassador College Graduate School of Theology In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Theology
by Herman L. Hoeh
1962(1963-1965, 1967 Edition)
CHAPTER EIGHTEEN
The History of Ireland
At first thought it may appear unusual that the Emerald Isle should have a recorded history far older than Rome. There is a reason.
Unlike Italy, for example, which for centuries felt the ravages of foreign invaders who drove out, in successive waves, each predecessor, Ireland remained under the continuous dominion of one people. Irish history begins, not with the Tower of Babel, but at the end of the flood. Irish history is the only literature which specifically connects Israel with its past. It has long been assumed that late monks invented this relationship under Catholic influence. Nothing could be further from the truth. Catholic influence elsewhere never associated the ancient world with Israel -- except the obvious case of Egypt. And in Ireland the Catholic monks did their best to make it appear that Ireland was not settled by Hebrews at all, but by Magog! This Irish 'myth' had its origin among the Catholic monks.
How Confusion Arose in Irish History
The history of Ireland under the Milesian kings has come down to us in two forms -- a short and a long form. The long form arose out of an attempt to make Irish history conform to the faulty chronology of the Septuagint Version approofd by the Roman Catholic Church. The Domestic Annals were artfully expanded to make it appear that Irish history commenced centuries earlier than it did in fact. The task of the monks was rendered easy by an unusual circumstance.
Under the Irish kings, Ireland was divided into several kingships or countries. Each country had its own sovereign who was related by blood to the other royal families. Among these contemporaries there was constant strife. First one branch, then another, gained the ascendancy and held the supreme office over Ireland. Whichever king sat on the throne in the supreme office became known as an 'Ard-Riga' or Arch King. As each King usually ruled much longer over his own kingship or country than as Arch King, he would have a longer and a shorter length of reign. At times there were disputed claims to the Arch Kingship, and also joint reigns. Each of these factors made it easy for certain later monks, who followed the Septuagint, to alter and expand the official record.
The original and correct history of the Milesians in Ireland has, however, been preserved unaltered only in the Domestic Annals, the official history of ancient Ireland. They may be found in O'Flaherty's 'Ogygia'. They have been reproduced in French in A.-M.-H.-J. Stokvis' 'Manuel D'Histoire', volume II, pages 234-235. The early history of Ireland, from the flood to the coming of the Milesians, may be found in Geoffrey Keating's 'History of Ireland', but his chronology is not always correct. In the following tables the Irish spellings have been generally preserved, including the unpronounced 'h's' indicative of aspirate sounds, a Hebrew affinity.
The First 1000 Years
According to Irish history the first claim to Irish soil was made by Nin mac Piel -- that is Irish for the Assyrian king Ninus, son of Bel or Belus. But no permanent settlement was established.
Ireland remained generally uninhabited for about three hundred years after the flood -- 2368-2068 -- records Keating (p. 114). In 2068 Parthalon and a band of Hebrew warriors arrived from the Greek world and established a settlement at Inis Saimer, a small island in the river Erne, at Ballyshannon. Thirty years later -- 2038 -Parthalon died and the land was divided between his four sons; Er, Orba, Ferann, and Fergna (p. 120) (p, 118). Twenty years later (2018) a plague befell the settlers. The settlers were exterminated, save for those who fled. After 30 years of desolation -- 2018-1988 -- the remnant that fled returned to Ireland and continued to inhabit it for another 250 years until 1738. The total time which the family of the Parthalonians inhabited Ireland was 300 years -- from 2068-2018 and from 1988-1738. Keating records that at this time another catastrophe came upon the Parthalonians, possibly at the hands of Phoenician Formorians. Keating quotes (p. 118) a poetic record:
'During thirty years, full told
It lay desolate, without warriors brave,
When all its hosts died in one week
In flocks upon Mash-n-Elta.'
No Irish historian professes to know when the Formorians came to Ireland.
This second period of thirty years' desolation -- 1738-1708 -- puzzled Keating. He doubted there were two similar periods of the same length, though his sources preserved the fact that there were indeed two.
A second and related wave of migrants came into Ireland from Scythia. Irish annalists often have been laughed at because they picture these migrants sailing from the Black Sea to the North Sea through what is now European Russia. Such 'poor geography' was in fact the same geography of early classical writers, who mentioned the early ease of sailing the same route. This geography is not unusual when it is recognized that the Pripet Marshes in Russia were once -- in the centuries after the Flood -- a vast lake connected by rivers to the Black and North seas!
The migrants from Scythia at this period were called Nemedians, after Nemedh, the leader of the expedition. They dwelt in Ireland for 216 years -- 1708-1492. During much of this time they were reduced to slavery under the Formorians. A part of the Nemedians fled to Grecian Thrace to escape the oppression (p. 126). They returned to Ireland 216 years after the Nemedians first reached the shores of Ireland. Upon their return they bore the epithet Fir-Bolgs, a name derived from the circumstances of their oppression while in Grecian Thrace. The Fir-Bolgs set up a kingship upon their conquest of the Formorians. From Keating a list of Fir-Bolg rulers may be obtained (pp. 131-132).
Thirty-six years after the Fir-Bolgs returned to Ireland -- 1456 -- the first small migration of the Tuatha-De-Danaan occurred. This was during the time of the Wandering in the wilderness under Moses. The total length of Danite dominion in Ireland before the coming of the royal house of the Milesians was 440 years -- 1456-1016 (p. 168). Keating quotes the ancient poet:
'Forty years above four hundred,
There were, since came the tribes of Dana
Across the straits of the great sea,
Till Miledh's sons first heard dread Ocean
His music beat on Eri's shores.'
By other reckonings the Danite dominion was much shorter -- only 197 years -- that is, from 1213-1016 This second migratory wave in 1213, was in the days of Barak and Deborah -- 1233-1193, when 'Dan abode in ships' (Judges 5:17). Deborah and Barak had delivered the children of Israel from Jabin. king of Canaan, whose military strength lay in Hazor and Syria. Jabin lorded it over Israel for 20 years -- 1253-1233 -- before his defeat. The Irish annals speak of this oppression. Keating records that while the tribe of Dan dwelt in Greece, 'It happened that a large fleet came from Syria to make war upon the people of the Athenian territory, in consequence of which they were engaged in daily battles .... As to the Tuatha-De-Dananns, when they saw the natives of the land thus vanquished by the Syrians, they all fled out of the country, through fear of those invaders. And they stopped not until they reached the regions of Lochlinn (Scandinavia), where they were welcomed by the inhabitants, on account of their many sciences and arts .... When they had remained a long time in these cities, they passed over to the north of Alba (Scotland), where they continued seven years in Dobar and Iardobar' (pp. 136-137). Keating continues (p. 139): 'When the Tuatha-De-Danann had remained seven years in the north of Scotland (or Alba), they passed over to Ireland and landed in the north of this country.'
Many Monkish tales were later told about the Tuatha-De-Danaan to make it appear they were a fabulous people. When the tales of magic are dismissed the truth is plain. The Tuatha-De-Danann of Keating's 'History' were none other than the tribe of Dan, and the invaders from Syria were the armies of Jabin king of Canaan!
The kings who bore rule for 197 years over the Danites in Ireland are found in O'Flaherty's 'Ogygia', in Keating's 'History of Ireland', pages 142-146, and in vol. II of Stokvis' 'Manuel', page 232.
The Coming of the Milesians
The ancient royal houses of Ireland and Scotland, and later of England, are derived from the Milesian Royal House that conquered Ireland in 1016. The Milesians were named after Miledh, or Milesius, of Spain, whose sons conquered Ireland and ruled over the Danites. All the migrants from Parthalon to the Milesians were distantly related to each other. The most famous ancestor of the Milesians was Eibher Scot -- Eber of Scotia, of Scythia -- identifying the Milesians as sons of Eber, or Hebrews. The children of Eber early settled in the regions of Scythia, and gave their name to Iberia, a region in the Caucasus in Classical times. The generations between Eber and Milesius are not completely preserved in any Irish annals -- the records are complete only after the coming of the Milesians to Ireland. A late fictitious genealogy going back to Magog arose in monkish times from the known fact that Hebrews once dwelt in Scythia, which was also inhabited by Magog.
A key to the line of descent may be found in the symbols used to designate various branches of the Milesian Royal House. Examples are the Crimson Branch, the Red Branch, signifying the line of Zarah from Judah. Zarah, at his birth, appeared with red thread about his hand. He was expected to be born first, but after his hand appeared, and the thread wound about it, the other brother Pharez came unexpectedly.
The wanderings of the family of Heber to Milesius are summarized by Keating on p. 173. The final migration, under Milesius, was from Egypt, via Thrace to Spain. This was shortly before the expulsion of the Hyksos in 1076. Of this period of Milesius in Egypt, Irish records declare: 'At this time, there was a great war between Pharaoh and the king of Ethiopia. Pharaoh made Miledh the commander of his army, when he had estimated his bravery and valor, and sent him to meet the forces of Ethiopia therewith. There then ensued many engagements and conflicts, between the forces under the command of Miledh and those of the Ethiopians. In these he was so successful that his fame and renown spread through all nations, whereupon Pharaoh gave him one of his own daughters to wife ....' (Keating, p. 176).
'Miledh at length remembered ... Ireland was the land in which it was destined that his posterity should obtain a lasting sovereignty. Upon this he fitted out three ships, supplied them with crews, and took his leave of Pharaoh. He then set sail from the mouth of the Nile, into the Mediterranean, and landed on an Island near Thrace.' (Reating, p. 177.) After further migrations the prince landed in Spain to join members of the family he had left behind years before. In Spain he died. There followed a scarcity of food in Spain for about 26 years according to Irish records (p. 179).
According to the Domestic Annals a consequent invasion of the Irish coast was planned to relieve the pressure from the drought. It occurred in 1016, near the end of the reign of David king of Israel. The invasion was successful. The Tuatha-De-Danaan were forced to accept the new line of Royalty. The realm of Ireland was now divided between the two surviving sons of Milesius -- Ebher and Ghedhe the Ereamhon (or Heremon). This Ghedhe, the Heremon, has often been mistaken by the British Israel World Federation for ANOTHER king of later fame ALSO CALLED 'the Heremon' in Irish bardic literature. Heremon or Ereamhon is a title, which, in the case of Ghedhe, came to be used as a personal name.
Of this Ghedhe the Heremon, brother of Eber, the 'Annals of the Four Masters' reads: 'Tea, the daughter of Lughaidh, son of Itha, whom Eremhon married in Spain.' This Tea is an altogether different person from the Tea who came more than four centuries later to the Irish Isles. The British Israel World Federation has confounded two different events, separated by over four centuries, simply because it was and is unwilling to believe the history of Ireland as it is plainly recorded. The Tea who married Ghedhe the Heremon was a daughter of Lughaidh, the son of Ith, uncle of Miledh (also spelled Mileadh). That is exactly what Irish history records. These events occurred in David's reign, not Zedekiah's. What did happen after Zedekiah's reign will be made plain shortly.
The brothers Eber and Gede the Heremon founded a town after gaining possession of Ireland. To be the new capital of Ireland, they named it Tea-mur, the town of Tea. At different times in history it has borne other names, the most common being Tara (cp. the Hebrew word 'Torah', meaning 'Law').
Did David Visit Ireland?
Even to this day another of the names of the old site of Tara has been preserved: Dowd's Town -- which means literally David's Town. The name is found attached to an area three miles north of Tara Hill (see B.M. Ordnance Survey maps, Ireland, 91, 101). Is it possible that David king of Israel visited Ireland and Tara toward the end of his life?
At the time of the founding of Tara shortly after 1016 an event occurred involving a beautiful woman who was 'sorrowful to a harlot.' The passage, quoted in the poem of Cuan O'Lochain ('Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy', vol. xviii, 1839, and other works), has never been fully understood. It can hardly refer to Tea who had long been married to Gede the Heremon. But, if David gave his daughter Tamar in marriage to Irial, the son of Gede, then all becomes clear. Tamar had been violated by her half-brother. She left the scene of the unfortunate event in a torn garb and remained unmarried in her brother's Absalom's house. See II Samuel 13. It was not until after the death of Absalom that David was free to depart for Ireland, very probably to give his disconsolate daughter in marriage to a prince of the line of Zarah.
Jeremiah Goes to Ireland
Now we come to one of the most remarkable events in history -- the joining of the lines of Pharez and Zarah in Ireland after the fall of Jerusalem in 585 B.C.
The Bible records God as saying that David would never lack a descendant to sit on his throne. Now consider, all of Zedekiah's sons were slaughtered before he was carried to Babylon. But his two daughters escaped with Jeremiah. Part of the story of how the line of David through Zedekiah continued has been preserved in Masonic tradition, and well known as recently as one century ago. Remember, kings and royalty of Britain have commonly been Masons.
According to this Masonic tradition, a Prince Eochaid of Ireland came to Jerusalem several years before 585. He was present during the siege. This Eochaid (meaning Knight) was none other than Oilioll Olchaoin, the son of Siorna Saoghlach mac Dian called the Heremon. Eochaid was blood royal of the Milesian Zarah line. After the fall of Jerusalem he married Zedekiah's daughter, named in the Masonic tradition Tea Tephi, of the Pharez line. They fled in 585 with Jeremiah and Baruch to Egypt.
The last Biblical record places them in Egypt. Masonic tradition, however, traces their journey to Ireland. Irish histories relate the arrival of a royal party in 569 B.C. (See 'The Irish Prince and the Hebrew Prophet', New York, 1896, pages 137-145). The arrivals included Prince Eochaid, his wife Tea Tephi, their son and a prophet called Ollamh Fodhla and his scribe Baruch. When they reached Tara, Eochaid was proclaimed king since his father had just died. A description from the Masonic tradition reads: 'Jeremiah had joined the hands of the prince and princess over the sacred stone (lia fail) ... and commanded the blessing of Israel's God to rest upon the throne of David.' ('The Irish Prince and the Hebrew Prophet', page 139).
This ceremony was not the marriage of Eochaid and Tea Tephi but, the symbolic joining of the lines of Zarah and Pharez.
The Milesian Kings
The following chart gives the list of kings unaltered and without need of restoration, from the Domestic Annals as preserved by O'Flaherty in his 'Ogygia'. Both the dates and lengths of reign are accurately preserved. The abbreviations after the names indicate from which branch of the Milesians the king descended. 'Er.' is the line of Ghedhe the Ereamhon; 'Eb.' is Ebher, brother of Ghedhe the Ereamhon; 'Ith' is the line of Ith or Itha, brother of Miledh or Mileadh; 'Irw' is the line of Ir, another (uncrowned) brother of Eber and Gede.
Arch Kings of Ireland | Lengths of Reign | Dates from O'Flaherty and the Domestic Annals |
Ghedhe the Ereamhon mac Mileadh |
14 |
1016-1002 |
Ebher mac Mileadh, rules jointly with his brother |
1 |
1016-1015 |
Muimhne mac Gede the Ereamhon, |
||
Luighne mac Gede, |
3 |
1002- 999 |
Laighne mac Gede |
||
Er mac Eber, |
||
Orba mac Eber, |
||
6 months |
999 |
|
Fearon mac Eber, |
||
Feorgna mac Eber |
||
'Irial' (Ariel) Faidh (meaning the 'prophet') mac Ereamhon |
10 |
999- 989 |
Eithrial mac Irial (Er.) |
20 |
989- 969 |
Conmhaol mac Eber |
30 |
969- 939 |
Tighearnmas mac Follagh (Er.) (Introduces idolatry into Ireland during heyday of Baalism in Israel and Judah.) |
23 |
939- 916 |
(Interregnum) |
(7) |
916- 909 |
Eochaidh I Eadghadhach mac Daire (Ith) |
4 |
909- 905 |
Cearmna Fionn mac Ebric (Ir), |
||
40 |
905- 865 |
|
Sobhairce mac Ebric (Ir) |
||
Eochaidh II Faobharglas mac Conmhaol (Eb.) |
20 |
865- 845 |
Fiachadh I Labhrainne mac Smiorgoll (Er.) |
24 |
845- 821 |
Eochaidh III Munho mac Mofebis (Eb.) |
21 |
821- 800 |
Aonghus I Olmucadha mac Fiachadh (Er.) |
18 |
800- 782 |
Eadhna I Airgtheach mac Eochaidh (Eb.) |
24 |
782- 758 |
Roitheachtach I mac Maoin (Er.) |
11 |
758- 747 |
Seadhna I mac Airtri (Ir) |
5 |
747- 742 |
Fiachadh II Fionscothach mac Seadhna (Ir) |
14 |
742- 728 |
Muineamhon mac Cas Clothach (Eb.) |
5 |
728- 723 |
Faildeargdoid mac Muineamhon (Eb.) |
9 |
723- 714 |
(Eochaidh) Ollamh Fodhla mac Fiachadh (Ir) (not the later prophet Ollamh Fodhla) |
40 |
714- 674 |
(Elim) Fionnachta I mac Ollamh (Ir) |
20 |
674- 654 |
Slanoll mac Ollamh (Ir) |
17 |
654- 637 |
Ghedhe Ollgothach mac Ollamh (Ir) |
12 |
637- 625 |
Fiachadh III Fionnailches mac Fionnachta (Ir) |
8 |
625- 617 |
Bearnghal mac Ghedhe (Ir) |
12 |
617- 605 |
Oilioll I mac Slanoll (Ir) |
15 |
605- 590 |
Siorna Saoghlach mac Dian (Er.), called the Heremon. He restored the power of the line of Ereamhon. At his death a prophet called Ollamh Fodhla brought Tea Tephi to Ireland with his son Oilioll Olchaoin, who was her husband. |
21 |
590- 569 |
Roitheachtach II mac Roan (Eb.) |
7 |
569- 562 |
Elim I Oillfinshneachta mac Roitheachtach (Eb.) |
1 |
562- 561 |
Giallchadh mac Oilioll Olchaoin (Er.), son of Tea Tephi |
9 |
561- 552 |
Art I Imleach mac Elim (Eb.) |
12 |
552- 540 |
Nuadhat I Fionnfoil mac Giallchadh (Er.) |
13 |
540- 527 |
Breas mac Art (Eb.) |
9 |
527- 518 |
Eochaidh IV Apthach mac Fionn (Ith) |
1 |
518- 517 |
Fionn mac Bratha (Ir) |
20 |
517- 497 |
Seadhna II Ionnarrach mac Breas (Eb.) |
14 |
497- 483 |
Siomon Breac mac Aodhan Glas (Er.) |
6 |
483- 477 |
Duach I Fionn mac Seadhna (Eb.) |
8 |
477- 469 |
Muireadhach I Bolgrach mac Siomon (Er.) |
1 |
469- 468 |
Eadhna II Dearg mac Duach (Eb.) |
5 |
468- 463 |
Lughaidh I Iardonn mac Eadhna (Eb.) |
5 |
463- 458 |
Siorlamh mac Fionn (Ir) |
16 |
458- 442 |
Eochaidh V Uaircheas mac Lughaidh (Eb.) |
12 |
442- 430 |
Eochaidh VI Fiadhmuine mac Congal Cosgarach, (Er.) |
5 |
430- 425 |
Conaing Beageaglach mac Congal Cosgarach (Er.) |
||
Lughaidh II Laimhdhearg mac Eochaidh (Eb.) |
4 |
425- 421 |
Conaing Beageaglach mac Congal Cosgarach (returns, (Er.) |
7 |
421- 414 |
Art II mac Lughaidh, (Eb.) |
7 |
414- 407 |
Fiacha Tolgrach (Er.) |
||
Oilioll II Fionn mac Art (Eb.) |
9 |
407- 398 |
Eochaidh VII mac Oilloll (Eb.) |
7 |
398- 391 |
Airgeatmhar mac Siorlamh (Ir) |
10 |
391- 381 |
Duach II Ladhgrach mac Fiachadh Tolgrach (Er.) |
10 |
381- 371 |
Lughaidh III Laighdhe mac Eochaidh (Eb.) |
4 |
371- 367 |
(Next four reign alternately in 28 years.)
Aodh I Ruadh mac Badharn (Ir) |
7 |
367- 360 |
Diothorba mac Deman (Ir) |
7 |
360- 353 |
Ciombaoth mac Fionntan (Ir) |
7 |
353- 346 |
The prophet Ollanh Fodhla lived about 240 years before his time. He was Jeremiah.
Machadh Mongruadh, Queen (Ir) |
7 |
346- 339 |
Reachtaidh Righdhearg mac Lughaidh (Eb.) |
9 |
339- 330 |
Ugaine Mor mac Eochaidh Buadhach (Er.) |
30 |
330- 300 |
(Ruled Western Europe to Tyrrhenian Sea. Time of Celtic greatness in Roman history.)
Badhbhchadh mac Eochaidh Buadhach (Er.) |
1 1/2 days |
300 |
Laoghaire I Lorc mac Ugaine (Er.) |
16 |
300- 284 |
Cobhthach Coal-Breagh mac Ugaine (Er.) |
17 |
284- 267 |
Maen Labhraidh Loingseach mac Oilioll Aine (Er.) |
14 |
267- 253 |
Melghe Molbhtach mac Cobhtach (Er.) |
12 |
253- 241 |
Modhcorb mac Cobhtach Caomh (Eb.) |
6 |
241- 235 |
Aonghus II Ollanh mac Oilioll (Er.) |
7 |
235- 228 |
Irereo (Iarann) Gleofathach mac Melghe (Er.) |
6 |
228- 222 |
Fearcorb mac Modhcorb (Eb.) |
7 |
222- 215 |
Connla Camh mac Irereo (Er.) |
4 |
215- 211 |
Oilioll III Caisfhiaclach mac Connla (Er.) |
25 |
211- 186 |
Adhamair Foltchaon mac Fearcorb (Eb.) |
5 |
186- 181 |
Eochaidh VIII Ailtleathan mac Oilioll (Er.) |
7 |
181- 174 |
Fearghus I Fortamhail mac Breasal Breac (Er.) |
12 |
174- 162 |
Aonghus III Tuirmheach Teamhrach mac Eochaidh (Er.) |
32 |
162- 130 |
Conall I Collamhrach mac Ederscel |
5 |
130- 125 |
Niadh Sedhamain mac Adhamair (Eb.) |
7 |
125- 118 |
Eadhna III Aighneach mac Aonghus |
10 |
118- 108 |
Criomthann I Cosgrach mac Fedhlimidh (Er.) |
4 |
108- 104 |
Rudhraighe mac Sithrighe (Ir) |
17 |
104- 87 |
Ionnatmar mac Niadh (Eb.) |
3 |
87- 84 |
Breasal Boidhiobhadh mac Rudhraighe (Ir) |
9 |
84- 75 |
Lughaidh IV Luaighne mac Ionnatmar (Eb.) |
15 |
75- 60 |
Congal I Claroineach mac Rudhraighe (Ir) |
3 |
60- 57 |
Duach III Dallta Deadhadh mac Cairbre Lusg (Eb.) |
7 |
57- 50 |
Feachtna Fathach mac Rudhraighe (Ir) |
24 |
50- 26 |
Eochaidh IX Feidhleach mac Finn (Er.) |
12 |
26- 14 |
Eochaidh X Aireamh mac Finn (Er.) |
10 |
14- 4 |
Ederscel mac Eoghan (Er.) |
4 |
4-1 |
Nuadhat II Neacht mac Seadhna Sithbhaic (Er.) |
1 |
|
Conaire I Mor mac Ederscel (Er.) |
59 |
1- 60 |
(Interregnum) |
5 |
60- 65 |
Lughaidh V Sriabhndearg mac Breas Fineamhnas (Er.) |
8 |
65- 73 |
Conchobhar I Abhradhruadh mac Finn Fili (Er.) |
1 |
73- 74 |
His year of reign corresponds to year 5 of Vespasian -- ('Annals of Tighernach')-73-74. |
||
Criomthann II Niadhnair mac Lughaidh (Er.) |
16 |
74- 90 |
Cairbre Cinncait (usurp.) and son |
5 |
90- 95 |
Morann Mac-Maom |
||
Fearadhach Finnfeachtnach mac Criomthann (Er.) |
21 |
95- 116 |
Fiatach Fionn mac Daire (Er.) |
3 |
116- 119 |
Fiachdh IV Finnfolaidh mac Fearadhach (Er.) |
7 |
119- 126 |
Elim II mac Conrach (Ir) |
4 |
126- 130 |
Tuathal I Teachtmhar mac Fiachadh (Er.) |
30 |
130- 160 |
Mal mac Rochraidhe (Ir) |
4 |
160- 164 |
Feidhlimidh Reachtmhar mac Tuathal (Er.) |
10 |
164- 174 |
Cathaoir Mor mac Feidhlimidh Firurghlais (Er.) |
3 |
174- 177 |
Conn Cedcathach mac Feidhlimidh (Er.) |
35 |
177- 212 |
Conaire II mac Modha-Lamha (Er.) |
8 |
212- 220 |
Art III Confhir mac Conn (Er.) |
30 |
220- 250 |
Lughaidh VI Mac-Con mac Macniadh (Ith) |
3 |
250- 253 |
Fearghus II Duibhdeadach mac Imchadh (Er.) |
1 |
253- 254 |
Cormac Ulfada mac Art (Er.) |
23 |
254- 277 |
Eochaidh XI Gonnat mac Feig (Er.) |
2 |
277- 279 |
Cairbre Liffeachair mac Cormac (Er.) |
17 |
279- 296 |
Fothadh I Cairptheach mac Lughaidh (Ith) and Fothadh II Airgtheach mac Lughaidh (Er.) |
1 |
296- 297 |
Fiachadh V Sraibhtine mac Cairbre (Er.) |
30 |
297- 327 |
Cairioll Colla-Uais mac Eochaidh Doimhlen (Er.) |
4 |
327- 331 |
Muireadhach II Tireach mac Fiachadh (Er.) |
26 |
331- 357 |
Caolbhadh mac Crunn Badhrai (Ir) |
1 |
357- 358 |
Eochaidh XII Muighmheadhoin mac Muireadhach (Er.) |
8 |
358- 366 |
Criomthann III mac Fidhach (Eb.) |
13 |
366- 379 |
Niall I Naoighiallach mac Eochaidh (Er.) |
26 |
379- 405 |
(Feradhach) Dathi mac Fiachra (Er.) |
23 |
405- 428 |
Laoghaire II mac Niall (Er.) |
35 |
428- 463 |
Oilioll IV Molt mac Dathi (Er.) |
20 |
463- 483 |
Lughaidh VII mac Laoghaire (Er.) |
25 |
483- 508 |
(Interregnum) |
5 |
508- 513 |
Muircheartach I Mor Mac-Earca mac Muireadhach (Hereafter all are of the line of Ereamhon.) |
20 |
513- 533 |
(Sent Lia Fail -- Stone of Destiny to Scotland (in 513) to officially establish branch dynasty under Fearghus mac Erc -- 513-529. See the history of the kings of Scotland.)
Tuathal II Maolgarbh mac Cormac Caoch |
11 |
533- 544 |
Diarmaid I mac Fearghus Ceirrbheoil |
21 |
544- 565 |
Fearghus III mac Muircheartach and Domhnall I Ilchealgach mac Muircheartach |
1 |
565- 566 |
Eochaidh XIII mac Domhnall and Boadan I mac Muircheartach |
2 |
566- 568 |
Ainmire mac Seadhna |
3 |
568- 571 |
Baodan II mac Ninnidh |
1 |
571- 572 |
Aodh II mac Ainmire |
27 |
572- 599 |
Aodh III Slaine mac Diarmaid and Colman Rimidh mac Baodan |
6 |
599- 605 |
Aodh IV Uairidhnach mac Domhnall Ilchealgach |
7 |
605- 612 |
Maolcobha mac Aodh |
3 |
612- 615 |
Suibhne Meann mac Fiachna |
13 |
615- 628 |
Domhnall II mac Aodh |
14 |
628- 642 |
Conall II Caol mac Maolcobha |
16 |
642- 658 |
Ceallach mac Maolcobha |
12 |
642- 654 |
Blathmac mac Aodh and Diarmaid II Ruaidnaigh mac Aodh |
7 |
658- 665 |
Seachnasach mac Blathmac |
6 |
665- 671 |
Ceannfaoladh mac Blathmac |
4 |
671- 675 |
Fionnachta II Fleadhach mac Dunchadh |
20 |
675- 695 |
Loingseach mac Aonghus |
9 |
695- 704 |
Congal II Ceann-Maghair mac Fearghus |
7 |
704- 711 |
Fearghal mac Maolduin |
11 |
711- 722 |
Fogartach mac Niall |
2 |
722- 724 |
Cionaoth mac Irgalach |
3 |
724- 727 |
Flaithbheartach mac Loingseach |
7 |
727- 734 |
Aodh V Allan mac Fearghal |
9 |
734- 743 |
Domhnall III mac Murchadh |
20 |
743- 763 |
Niall II Frosach mac Fearghal |
7 |
763- 770 |
Donnchadh I mac Domhnall |
27 |
770- 797 |
Aodh VI Oirnidhe mac Niall |
22 |
797- 819 |
Conchobhar II mac Donnchadh |
14 |
819- 833 |
Niall III Caille mac Aodh |
13 |
833- 846 |
Maolseachlainn I mac Maolruanaidh |
17 |
846- 863 |
Aodh VII Finnlaith mac Niall |
16 |
863- 879 |
Viking invasions ravaged Ireland in 843 under Niall III Caille. While Niall was reigning, his son Aodh VII Finnlaith presented (in 843) the Lia Fail permanently to the king of Scotland, whose daughter he married. (See O'Flaherty's 'Ogygia'.) The Scottish king, Kenneth mac Alpin (843-858), thereby became full heir to the now-bankrupt Irish line which was forced to submit to Viking rule. The throne line was thus transferred to Scotland, from whence it would be transferred, in a few centuries, to England.
The Throne in Scotland
In 503 a migration to Scotland established the direct line of Eremon in the new land.
Kings of the Scots | Lengths of Reign | Dates |
Loarn mac Erc |
10 |
503-513 |
Fearghus I mac Erc |
16 |
513-529 |
Fearghus I receives Lia Fail for coronation ceremony.
Domhangart mac Fearghus |
5 |
529-534 |
Comghall mac Domhangart |
24 |
534-558 |
Gabhran mac Domhangart |
2 |
558-560 |
Conall I mac Comghall |
14 |
560-574 |
Aodhan mac Gabhran |
32 |
574-606 |
Eochaidh I Buidhe mac Aodhan |
23 |
606-629 |
Conadh Cerr mac Eochaidh |
629 |
|
Domhnall I Breac mac Eochaidh |
13 |
629-642 |
Fearchar I mac Connchadh |
7 |
642-649 |
Conall II Crandamhna mac Eochaidh Dungal I mac Duban |
11 |
649-660 |
Domhnall II Donn mac Conall |
13 |
660-673 |
Moalduin mac Conall |
16 |
673-689 |
Fearchar II Fada mac Feradhach |
8 |
689-697 |
Eochaidh II Rianamhail mac Domhangart |
1 |
697-698 |
Ainbhceallach mac Fearchar |
698 |
|
Sealbach mac Fearchar |
25 |
698-723 |
Dungal II mac Sealbach |
3 |
723-726 |
Eochaidh III Angbhaid mac Eochaidh |
7 |
726-733 |
Dungal II mac Sealbach (returns) |
3 |
733-736 |
Alpin mac Eochaidh |
5 |
736-741 |
(Royal line suppressed until 843 by a related branch of Pictish kings. For princes of Scottish line from 741 to 843 see page 230 of Vol. II of Stokvis' 'Manuel'.)
Kings of Scotland | Lengths of Reign | Dates |
Cinaeth I (Kenneth) mac Alpin (Obtains Lia Fail from son-in-law, Aodh VII Finnliath of Ireland, in 843.) |
15 |
843-858 |
Domhnall III (Donald) |
4 |
858-862 |
Custantin I |
14 |
862-876 |
Aodh II |
2 |
876-878 |
(Eochaidh V, king Strathclyde) |
(11) |
(878-889) |
Circ mac Dungal |
11 |
878-889 |
Domhnall IV |
11 |
889-900 |
Custantin II |
43 |
900-943 |
Maelcolaim I (Malcolm) |
11 |
943-954 |
Illuilb |
8 |
954-962 |
Dubh |
5 |
962-967 |
Cuillen |
4 |
967-971 |
Cinaeth II |
24 |
971-995 |
Custantin III |
2 |
995-997 |
Cinaeth III |
8 |
997-1005 |
Maelcolaim II |
29 |
1005-1034 |
Donnchadh I (Duncan) |
6 |
1034-1040 |
Macbeathadh (Macbeth) |
17 |
1040-1057 |
Lulach |
1 |
1057-1058 |
Maelcolaim III Ceanmohr |
35 |
1058-1093 |
Domhnall V Bane |
4 |
1093-1097 |
Donnchadh II |
1 |
1093-1094 |
Edgar |
12 |
1094-1106 |
Alexander I |
18 |
1106-1124 |
David I |
29 |
1124-1153 |
Maelcolaim IV |
12 |
1153-1165 |
William |
49 |
1165-1214 |
Alexander II |
35 |
1214-1249 |
Alexander III |
37 |
1249-1286 |
Margaret |
4 |
1286-1290 |
(Interregnum) |
(2) |
(1290-1292) |
Dynasties of Baliol and of Bruce
John Baloil |
4 |
1292-1296 |
(Interregnum) |
(10) |
(1296-1306) |
In 1296 Edward I of England declared himself king of Scotland and removed the coronation stone -- Lia Fail -- from Scone to Westminster.
Robert I Bruce |
23 |
1306-1329 |
David II Bruce |
4 |
1329-1333 |
Edward Baliol |
13 |
1333-1346 |
David II Bruce (returns) |
25 |
1346-1371 |
Dynasty of the Stuarts
Robert II |
19 |
1371-1390 |
Robert III |
16 |
1390-1406 |
James I |
31 |
1406-1437 |
James II |
23 |
1437-1460 |
James III |
28 |
1460-1488 |
James IV |
25 |
1488-1513 |
James V |
29 |
1513-1542 |
Mary |
25 |
1542-1567 |
James VI, becomes James I of England in 1603 |
58 |
1567-1625 |
With this outline the essentials of Irish history are restored. For details of the reigns of each king of Ireland consult Keating's 'History of Ireland', or O'Flaherty. The modern idea that the Irish were illiterate, and that their history is all myth, is itself a modern myth. The real myths circulating in the name of Irish history are generally limited to attempts on the part of the Catholic Church to hide the identity of the racial descent of the Irish nation. In fact, the only reason for ever inventing myth is to hide, obscure or pervert some evidence or truth. Once the source of Truth -- the Bible -- is manifest, the difference between myth and fact becomes readily apparent.